By Eric Bright
Update 3 2020-10-10:
1- Typo corrected (thank you einpoklum for pointing that out)
Update 2 2020-09-07:
I stand corrected:
1- “ungraceful,” I am told I was, not “ungrateful”
2- The LO forked happened before AOO. That is true. Duly noted and corrected
3- There were many more reasons that lead to the eventual LO fork. Absolutely true
Update 1 2020-09-07:
I was informed by people involved with TDF that:
1- LO is based on “an extremely old, complex C++ codebase full of legacy stuff” [I knew that]
2- I was blaming the programmers for the issues the code has [not true. Read the post again]
3- I was being “ungrateful” [not true. Read the post again]
4- The LO does have some serious issues
5- The contributors have been trying to help and fix them [absolutely true]
6- I am “blaming developers for not doing more” and hence am getting in the way of those who are trying to help [really? ?]
7- I “mis-informed” my friend from whom I asked for insights [read the post and see if that is true]
8- I am advocating for more “committee” to fix the problem of something being “designed by a committee.” [conflating concepts, sarcastic, a red-herring/straw-man cocktail, playing with words. Read the ...
What a wild-goose chase! This is exactly how the AOO’s BoD were reacting to all criticisms back in the days. I came to the same conclusion as those critics of AOO once did: There is no point in all these, since history repeats itself.
